• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Rayea, M., Amer, M., Mousa, A., Farghaly, M. (2019). Comparative Study between Slow Conventional Freezing and Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Human Spermatozoa in Large Volume. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 77(6), 5983-5988. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.66691
Mohammed M. Farid Rayea; Medhat Kamel Amer; Ahmed Abdelhady Mousa; Mohammed Gamal Farghaly. "Comparative Study between Slow Conventional Freezing and Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Human Spermatozoa in Large Volume". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 77, 6, 2019, 5983-5988. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.66691
Rayea, M., Amer, M., Mousa, A., Farghaly, M. (2019). 'Comparative Study between Slow Conventional Freezing and Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Human Spermatozoa in Large Volume', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 77(6), pp. 5983-5988. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.66691
Rayea, M., Amer, M., Mousa, A., Farghaly, M. Comparative Study between Slow Conventional Freezing and Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Human Spermatozoa in Large Volume. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2019; 77(6): 5983-5988. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.66691

Comparative Study between Slow Conventional Freezing and Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Human Spermatozoa in Large Volume

Article 29, Volume 77, Issue 6, October 2019, Page 5983-5988  XML PDF (396.79 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.66691
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohammed M. Farid Rayea1; Medhat Kamel Amer1; Ahmed Abdelhady Mousa2; Mohammed Gamal Farghaly email 1
1Department of Andrology, Sexology and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
2Department of Andrology, Sexology and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Bani Suef University
Abstract
Background: Cryopreservation is the collection, freezing, and long term storage of sperm, and is a highly effective method of protecting male fertility. Cryopreservation of semen has been widely used as a vital method for fertility preservation of male patients before undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery that may lead to testicular failure or ejaculatory dysfunction. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the aseptic technology of cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa in large volume, to conventional freezing protocol as regards post thawing motility, vitality and sperm DNA fragmentation. Patients and methods: This study included a total of 20 male patients seeking seminal fluid analysis, attending at the andrology laboratory of a specialized IVF center (ADAM International Hospital for Fertility and Sterility, Giza, Egypt. Patients were presented with the diagnoses of normozoospermia, oligozoospermia (either isolated or combined with asthenozoospermia or teratozoospermia). Results: Motility of (in a large volume (300 µl) in the absence of permeable cryoprotectants displayed significant statistically lower levels as compared to conventional Sperm Freezing. It was shown in different groups at different times (post thawing and 1-hour and 24-hour) of assessment that motility of vitrified spermatozoa decreases in comparison with slow conventional freezing as we go from the baseline. DNA fragmentation of vitrified spermatozoa showed higher levels as compared to conventional slow freezing but there is no significant statistical difference between vitrification and conventional slow freezing in DNA fragmentation. Conclusion: It could be concluded that vitrification technique was quite far away from comparison with slow conventional freezing protocol, and still need for further modifications and wide scale of study to achieve the good results.
Keywords
Slow Conventional Freezing; Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification; Human Spermatozoa in Large Volume
Statistics
Article View: 254
PDF Download: 604
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.