• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Ammar, A., Abdel Dayem, M., Farag, N., Darahim, K., Elserafy, A., Mohammed, H. (2016). Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Intervention for Type C Coronary Lesions. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 65(1), 553-567. doi: DOI : 10.12816/0033764
Ahmed Essam EL-Din Mohamed Ammar; Mohamed Khairy Abdel Dayem; Nabil Mahmoud Farag; Khaled Elsayed Elarabi Darahim; Ahmed Shawky Elserafy; Haitham Galal Mohammed. "Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Intervention for Type C Coronary Lesions". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 65, 1, 2016, 553-567. doi: DOI : 10.12816/0033764
Ammar, A., Abdel Dayem, M., Farag, N., Darahim, K., Elserafy, A., Mohammed, H. (2016). 'Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Intervention for Type C Coronary Lesions', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 65(1), pp. 553-567. doi: DOI : 10.12816/0033764
Ammar, A., Abdel Dayem, M., Farag, N., Darahim, K., Elserafy, A., Mohammed, H. Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Intervention for Type C Coronary Lesions. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2016; 65(1): 553-567. doi: DOI : 10.12816/0033764

Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Intervention for Type C Coronary Lesions

Article 12, Volume 65, Issue 1, Autumn 2016, Page 553-567  XML PDF (509.69 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: DOI : 10.12816/0033764
Authors
Ahmed Essam EL-Din Mohamed Ammar email ; Mohamed Khairy Abdel Dayem; Nabil Mahmoud Farag; Khaled Elsayed Elarabi Darahim; Ahmed Shawky Elserafy; Haitham Galal Mohammed
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University
Abstract
Background: the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an invasive access technique that allows analysis of characteristics (qualitative and quantitative) of coronary atherosclerosis. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex lesions (i.e., American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association class type C) remains challenging and the outcome may be compromised. The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to guide PCI was suggested to improve outcome.
The Objectives: aim of this study wasto compare intravascular ultrasound-guided and angiography-guided Intervention for Type C coronary lesions regarding major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Patients and Methods: Our study was conducted on patients undergoing elective PCI for type C coronary lesions in Cardiology Department in Ain Shams University hospitals. The study included 50 patients who underwent IVUS guidance PCI for Type C lesions and 50 patients who underwent only angiographic guidance PCI for Type C lesions. We evaluated the impact of IVUS guidance on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI for complex lesions defined as ACC/AHA type C. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite end-point of all-cause mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization, were compared between the 2 groups. Mean follow-up duration was 12 months. Results: baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both patient groups. Adding IVUS to the procedure lengthened the procedure time. On the other hand, lower amount of radiographic contrast was required in the IVUS guided group during the procedure. Regarding the target coronary vessel in our study was similar in both groups with no significant difference. In addition, the number of ostial, proximal, mid and distal lesions was similar between the two studied groups. Patients with IVUS-guided PCI underwent more direct stenting, more postdilatation, larger maximal stent diameter and greater number of implanted stents. Consequently, the final diameter stenosis was significantly better in IVUS guided group. A strategy of routine IVUS for drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions did not improve the 1-year MACE rates.
Conclusion: use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is associated with lower amount of radiographic contrast used during the procedure, more procedural time, more post dilatation and less postintervention final diameter stenosis. In addition, use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in complex lesions allows proper assessment of minimal lumen area, optimizing PCI procedures and confirming stent well apposition.
 
Keywords
intravascular ultrasound; Major adverse cardiac events
Statistics
Article View: 67
PDF Download: 44
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.