Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in Abdominal and Pelvic Diagnoses

Albakri, Ibrahim Abdullah Abdulrazaq; Al-Qahtani, Refah Saad; Alsharif, Maher Ghazi; Alenezi, Hadil Mohammed; Ahmad, Ghaida Mohammad; Aljuhani, Ahmed Sulaiman; Alaliwi, Salman Ali; A. Alqarni, Abdullah Mohammed; Alkhalifa, Abdullah Ali; Alamri, Doaa Yousif; Balkheir, Mohammed Abobakr Hassan; Alabudib, Fatimah Abduladhim

doi:10.12816/0042564

Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in Abdominal and Pelvic Diagnoses

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Najran University

² King Abdulaziz Hospital

³ Northern Border University

⁴ Arabian Gulf University

⁵ King Khalid University

⁶ Ministry Of Health

⁷ Taiba University

⁸ Albaha University

⁹ Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

10.12816/0042564

Abstract

Introduction: the major imaging modalities used in diagnosis of pelvic and abdominal conditions ranged from X-ray, ultrasonography, computed tomography and many more. In each different kind of disorder; a different modality is preferred based on the nature of disease, the patient and the hospital where the management is provided. Some conditions require more than one source of imaging. Aim of the work: this study aimed to discuss various abdominal and pelvic pathologies separately to explore the preferred type of imaging modality.
Methodology: we conducted this review using a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE from January 1994 to March 2017. The following search terms were used: ultrasound versus CT, acute abdomen imaging, abdominal radiology and pelvic pain diagnosis
Conclusion: various disorders and conditions required different modality of imaging and a health care provider must be well informed of the benefits and risks and be able to weigh in order to make use of the most appropriate imaging technique.

Keywords