• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 100 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Alqassas, M., Shalaby, M., Ismael, M., Nasr, A. (2018). Clinical Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine, Magnesium sulphate and Ketofol versus Midazolam for Sedation During Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation in Predicted Difficult Air ways Patients. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 72(7), 4843-4852. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.10147
Mohammad H.M. Alqassas; Mostafa I. Shalaby; Maamoun M. Ismael; Ahmed S.A. Nasr. "Clinical Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine, Magnesium sulphate and Ketofol versus Midazolam for Sedation During Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation in Predicted Difficult Air ways Patients". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 72, 7, 2018, 4843-4852. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.10147
Alqassas, M., Shalaby, M., Ismael, M., Nasr, A. (2018). 'Clinical Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine, Magnesium sulphate and Ketofol versus Midazolam for Sedation During Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation in Predicted Difficult Air ways Patients', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 72(7), pp. 4843-4852. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.10147
Alqassas, M., Shalaby, M., Ismael, M., Nasr, A. Clinical Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine, Magnesium sulphate and Ketofol versus Midazolam for Sedation During Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation in Predicted Difficult Air ways Patients. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2018; 72(7): 4843-4852. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.10147

Clinical Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine, Magnesium sulphate and Ketofol versus Midazolam for Sedation During Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation in Predicted Difficult Air ways Patients

Article 13, Volume 72, Issue 7, July 2018, Page 4843-4852  XML PDF (506.4 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.10147
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohammad H.M. Alqassas email ; Mostafa I. Shalaby; Maamoun M. Ismael; Ahmed S.A. Nasr
Anathesia and Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background and objectives: Awake fiber optic intubation (AFOI) is recommended technique in securing the airway in predicted difficult airway patients with sedation. However, it is not easy to achieve a comfortable sedation so conscious sedation is the key for a successful AFOI. The goal of the study to compare different conscious sedation strategies aimed to improve comfort and safety in patients prepared for elective surgeries. Subjects and Methods: Case control, randomized controlled study in predicted difficult airway patients scheduled for elective surgery under GA carried out at AL-Azhar University Hospitals after approval by the local ethical committee. 120 patients of age group 18-60 years old with ASA I and II prepared for nasal (AFOI) under conscious sedation after giving their informed written consent to participate in our study. The patients were randomly assigned into 4 groups: Group dexmedetomidine (DEX), group ketofol, group magnesium sulfate and group midazolam. HR, MAP, Oxygen saturation and end tidal CO2 were monitored. Sedation score, patient tolerance, patient satisfaction and intubation score (vocal cord movement and coughing) were assessed.
Results: All patients were successfully intubated by fiber optic and none of them developed bradycardia or reduced MAP more than 20% from the base line during intubation. Group DEX mild decrease in MAP and HR (<10% fall when compared with the baseline value) after loading of drug and during intubation in contrast to midazolam, ketofol and magnesium sulphate, which increase during intubation. There was no statistically significant difference in the intubation scores, grimace score, time of intubation, number of attempts and saturation in between the groups with one episode of desaturation in group ketofol and two in group midazolam (P > 0.05). Group ketofol and midazolam patients were sedated deeper after the start of the study drugs than group DEX and none of the patients were sedated to a score of < 2 (modified OAA/S score) in either of the groups. Group magnesium showed lighter sedation level significantly different with other groups.
Conclusion: Study showed DEX provides optimum sedation without compromising airway or hemodynamic stability with favorable intubation time and less intubation attempts during AFOI in comparison to magnesium sulphate, ketofol and midazolam patients with better patient tolerance and satisfaction. 
Keywords
(AFOI) Awake fiberoptic intubation; (DI) difficult intubation; (DEX) dexmedetomidine
Statistics
Article View: 308
PDF Download: 571
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.