• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Issue Issue 1
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 7
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Reham Mostafa Mohammed, M. (2018). Assessment of Accuracy of Three Ultrasound Methods for Prediction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 71(2), 2505-2511.
Mohamed Taha Ismail, Ahmed Mahmoud Hussein*, Heba Abdel Basset Allam, Reham Mostafa Mohammed. "Assessment of Accuracy of Three Ultrasound Methods for Prediction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 71, 2, 2018, 2505-2511.
Reham Mostafa Mohammed, M. (2018). 'Assessment of Accuracy of Three Ultrasound Methods for Prediction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 71(2), pp. 2505-2511.
Reham Mostafa Mohammed, M. Assessment of Accuracy of Three Ultrasound Methods for Prediction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2018; 71(2): 2505-2511.

Assessment of Accuracy of Three Ultrasound Methods for Prediction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Article 12, Volume 71, Issue 2, April 2018, Page 2505-2511  XML PDF (314.22 K)
Document Type: Original Article
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Mohamed Taha Ismail, Ahmed Mahmoud Hussein*, Heba Abdel Basset Allam, Reham Mostafa Mohammed
Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background: fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the most important complications encountered during pregnancy. The growth-restricted fetus is a fetus that fails to reach its growth potential and is at risk for adverse perinatal morbidity and mortality. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) defines an IUGR fetus as a fetus with an estimated weight below the 10th percentile
Objective: the study aimed to assess accuracy of transcerebellar diameter (TCD)/ abdominal circumference (AC) ratio, head circumference (HC)/ abdominal circumference (AC) ratio and hepato-cephalic index (HCI) in predicting intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) after 20 weeks of gestation in pregnant women at risk of developing IUGR.
Materials and Methods: a prospective nested cohort study was conducted on 77 pregnant women at risk for IUGR at Ain-Shams University Maternity hospital. all women were examined by abdominal two-dimensional ultrasound after 20 weeks of gestation to assess the sonographic gestational age (BPD, HC, FL, AC, AFI, degree of placental maturation) in fetuses. The Fetal Liver Length (FLL) and Transcelebellar Diameter (TCD) were measured at the time of the scan. Hepato-cephalic index (HCI) was calculated as Fetal Liver Length (FLL)/ Biparital diameter (BPD). TCD/AC ratio was calculated by dividing Transcerebellar diameter (TCD) and abdominal circumference (AC). HC/AC ratio was calculated by dividing Head circumference (HC) and abdominal circumference (AC). All women were followed up and an abdominal ultrasound was done after 3 weeks to confirm diagnosis of IUGR and the same fetal parameters were measured and documented
Results: in predicting IUGR; TCD/AC and HC/AC have significant excellent diagnostic performance with 95%CI 0.829–1.000 and 0.851–0.974 respectively. HCI has significant moderate diagnostic performance with 95% CI 0.787–0.956. As regards comparison between the three ratios in prediction of IUGR in our study, we found that: TCD/AC with a cut-off value ≥13.77 has the highest diagnostic performance in prediction of IUGR. HC/AC with a cut-off value ≥1.04 has moderate diagnostic characteristics in prediction of IUGR. HCI with a cut-off value ≤0.55 has the lowest diagnostic characteristics in prediction of IUGR
Conclusions: TCD/AC ratio had a better diagnostic validity and accuracy compared to HC/AC and HCI in predicting IUGR.
Keywords
intrauterine growth restriction; Transcerebellar Diameter; Head circumference; abdominal circumference
Statistics
Article View: 295
PDF Download: 494
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.