• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 100 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Issue Issue 1
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 7
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Mohammed A Refaie, A. (2018). Comparative Study between Intravenous Paracetamol and Pethidine as Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 71(6), 3314-3321.
Abd El-Moneim M Zakaria, Ashraf H Mohammed, Mohammed E Hammour, Mohammed A Refaie. "Comparative Study between Intravenous Paracetamol and Pethidine as Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 71, 6, 2018, 3314-3321.
Mohammed A Refaie, A. (2018). 'Comparative Study between Intravenous Paracetamol and Pethidine as Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 71(6), pp. 3314-3321.
Mohammed A Refaie, A. Comparative Study between Intravenous Paracetamol and Pethidine as Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2018; 71(6): 3314-3321.

Comparative Study between Intravenous Paracetamol and Pethidine as Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia

Article 8, Volume 71, Issue 6, April 2018, Page 3314-3321  XML PDF (399.25 K)
Document Type: Original Article
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Abd El-Moneim M Zakaria, Ashraf H Mohammed, Mohammed E Hammour, Mohammed A Refaie
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Al-Azhar University
Abstract
Background: Management of acute pain after cesarean section has evolved considerably over the past decade. The general approach to pain after cesarean section is changing, shifting away from traditional opioid-based therapy. Typical analgesic regimens include opioids and nono-pioid analgesics, such as paracetamol and NSAIDs, with the variable addition of local anesthetic techniques. Aim of the Work: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravenous infusion of paracetamol in comparison with meperidine (pethidine) as post cesarean section analgesia, as demonstrated by the degree of pain relief. Patients and Methods: This terventional prospective randomized study was conducted at El- Helal Hospital for Health Insurance, Damitta. It comprised (90) labouring women who seek post C.S analgesia. They were divided into two groups: 1st group (group A, 45 women): They received 100 ml intravenous perfalgan containing 1000 mg paracetamol. Second group (group B, 45 women): They received 50 mg meperidine hydrochloride Intramuscular. Results: There was a statistically significant lower pulse rate in the pethidine group 84.3 ± 5.18 as compared to paracetamol group 87.3 ± 6.85 (p=0.024). While systolic and diastolic Blood pressure showed non-significant difference between the two groups. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) after 1hour of receiving analgesia in the paracetamol group was 2.19 ± 0.79 while in the pethidine group it was 2.09 ± 0.72 and this was statistically significant (p=0.039*). As regards side effects, in the pethedine group, 3 (6.7%) patients had nausea and vomiting, 2 (4.4%) patients had hypotension and 1 (2.2%) patient had a decreased respiratory rate, While, no side effects noticed in the paracetamol group. This difference was statistically highly significant (p=0.037*). Conclusion: Paracetamol is as effective as pethidine in relieving pain after cesarean section. Prescribing paracetamol in the form of intravenous infusion can be suggested as a suitable alternative for opioid after the operation. No side effects were noticed in patients who received paracetamol making it highly safe. Recommendations: Further studies on a larger scale of patients are needed to confirm the results obtained by this study.
Keywords
intravenous paracetamol; Pethidine; cesarean section; Analgesia
Statistics
Article View: 356
PDF Download: 685
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.