Comparison between Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion during Cesarean Section and Postpartum Insertion

Document Type : Original Article

Abstract

Background: Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) insertion timing, particularly during cesarean section or postpartum, is a crucial consideration for effective contraception and patient satisfaction.
Objective: To compare the outcomes of IUD insertion during cesarean section versus delayed postpartum insertion in terms of retention, side effects, and patient satisfaction.
Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study involved 250 women aged 18-45 years with full-term pregnancies scheduled for cesarean delivery at Benha University Hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A (n=125) had IUD insertion during cesarean section, and Group B (n=125) had delayed IUD insertion; 8 weeks postpartum. Follow-up assessments at 3 months included quantitative serum pregnancy test, pelvic examination with transvaginal ultrasonography, side effects evaluation, and satisfaction measurement using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Results: Abnormal bleeding occurred in 24% of Group A and 19.2% of Group B (p=0.356). Pain was reported by 24% in Group A and 16.8% in Group B (p=0.158). Retention rates were 84% for Group A and 92% for Group B (p=0.052). Expulsion rates showed no significant difference: partial expulsion occurred in 11% of Group A and 6% of Group B (p=0.18), complete expulsion in 5% of Group A and 2% of Group B (p=0.151). Group B had significantly higher strings visibility (96% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001) and higher VAS satisfaction scores (0.83±0.76 vs. 4.86±0.92, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Delayed postpartum IUD insertion results in higher retention rates and satisfaction compared to insertion during cesarean section. However, both methods are viable options for postpartum contraception.
 

Keywords

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Volume 95, Issue 1
April 2024
Pages 2266-2269

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics