• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Seifalyazal, M., Elnagar, M., Mohamed, S., Elnabil-Mortada, A. (2023). Comparative Review of Outcomes between Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal Technique with Inherently Divided Douglas’ Line and Totally Extraperitoneal Technique for Repairing Inguinal Hernia. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 90(1), 1033-1039. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2023.280205
Mohamed Elsayed Seifalyazal; Mohamed Elnagar; Sameh Said Mohamed; Ahmed Elnabil-Mortada. "Comparative Review of Outcomes between Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal Technique with Inherently Divided Douglas’ Line and Totally Extraperitoneal Technique for Repairing Inguinal Hernia". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 90, 1, 2023, 1033-1039. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2023.280205
Seifalyazal, M., Elnagar, M., Mohamed, S., Elnabil-Mortada, A. (2023). 'Comparative Review of Outcomes between Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal Technique with Inherently Divided Douglas’ Line and Totally Extraperitoneal Technique for Repairing Inguinal Hernia', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 90(1), pp. 1033-1039. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2023.280205
Seifalyazal, M., Elnagar, M., Mohamed, S., Elnabil-Mortada, A. Comparative Review of Outcomes between Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal Technique with Inherently Divided Douglas’ Line and Totally Extraperitoneal Technique for Repairing Inguinal Hernia. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2023; 90(1): 1033-1039. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2023.280205

Comparative Review of Outcomes between Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal Technique with Inherently Divided Douglas’ Line and Totally Extraperitoneal Technique for Repairing Inguinal Hernia

Article 153, Volume 90, Issue 1, January 2023, Page 1033-1039  XML PDF (594.91 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2023.280205
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Elsayed Seifalyazal email ; Mohamed Elnagar; Sameh Said Mohamed; Ahmed Elnabil-Mortada
Abstract
Background: The inguinal hernia can be repaired using a variety of laparoscopic methods. The most popular procedures are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP). TEP technique is regarded closet to ideal. However, it has limitations that inspired the evolution of e-TEP. This small e stands for enhanced or extended view. Although the division of Douglas’ line is not inherent to e-TEP technique, it offers a wider working place for secondary ports. Objective: To compare extended view totally extraperitoneal repair with inherently divided Douglas’ line to totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia concerning operative time, ease of the procedure and postoperative complications. Patients and Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 55 patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia underwent laparoscopic repair between January 2019 and November 2021. Thirty-one patients (56.4%) underwent e-TEP technique with inherently divided Douglas’ line (group I) and twenty-four patients (43.6%) underwent TEP technique (group II). Results: No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding age, sex and body mass index. Overall complication rate was higher in TEP group than in e-TEP group. Mean operative time, hospital stay, and pain score were less in e-TEP technique with inherently divided Douglas’ line. The number of used tacks, and early return to work were significantly different for favor of e-TEP group.
Conclusion: Enhanced view TEP technique with inherently divided Douglas’ line is superior to TEP technique for repairing inguinal hernia in providing a better visual angle and ergonomics with lower complication rates and shorter operative time
 
Keywords
Hernia; Douglas’ line; TEP; e-TEP
Statistics
Article View: 151
PDF Download: 311
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.