• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 100 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Aboleineen, M., Kandil, N., Farahat, A., Salama, A. (2022). Outcome of Primary versus Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Different Times in Patients Presenting with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 89(1), 4386-4392. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.258449
Mohammed Wafaie Aboleineen; Nader Talat Kandil; Ahmed Abdelzaher Farahat; Alaa Elsayed Salama. "Outcome of Primary versus Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Different Times in Patients Presenting with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 89, 1, 2022, 4386-4392. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.258449
Aboleineen, M., Kandil, N., Farahat, A., Salama, A. (2022). 'Outcome of Primary versus Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Different Times in Patients Presenting with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 89(1), pp. 4386-4392. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.258449
Aboleineen, M., Kandil, N., Farahat, A., Salama, A. Outcome of Primary versus Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Different Times in Patients Presenting with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2022; 89(1): 4386-4392. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.258449

Outcome of Primary versus Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Different Times in Patients Presenting with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Article 39, Volume 89, Issue 1, October 2022, Page 4386-4392  XML PDF (508.71 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.258449
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohammed Wafaie Aboleineen; Nader Talat Kandil; Ahmed Abdelzaher Farahat email ; Alaa Elsayed Salama
Abstract
Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients withST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 12 h of symptom onset, provided it can be performed expeditiously (i.e. 120 min from STEMI diagnosis, by an experienced team. An experienced team includes not only interventional cardiologists but also skilled support staff.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the early and 6-month outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients according to the use of primary PCI and three different protocols of pharmaco-invasive reperfusion in the acute stage based on timing of PCI after thrombolytic therapy.
Patients and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Cardiology Department, Zagazig University Hospitals and National Heart Institute. We included 104 consecutive patients with anterior STEMI, within a time period of six months from January 2021 to June 2021.
Results: We found that group A patients had the lowest incidence of major adverse cardiacevents (MACE) (death, Maximal Killip class ≥II, severe and life-threatening bleeding) and highest median EF, Group B patients had almost similar MACE rates and 2nd high median LVEF, followed by group C with slightly impaired results, while Group D patients had the highest MACE rates and lowest median LVEF. 
Conclusions: Our study showed that pharmaco-invasive strategy with early PCI after fibrinolysis within 24 hours constitutes a valid reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with ST elevation Myocardial infarction, where primary PCI was not feasible, and that the best acute stage and 6 month outcome is achieved with performance of early coronary angiography and intervention within 3-17 hours after fibrinolysis.
 
Keywords
ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; Primary PCI; Left ventricular ejection fraction
Statistics
Article View: 236
PDF Download: 410
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.