• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Albahy, A., Elsaid, M., Negm, A., Mokhtar, A., ElGansh, A., Shetewy, M. (2022). Anatomical Repair Versus Intra Peritoneal Mesh Repair of Umbilical and Paraumbilical Hernia in Ascitic Patients: Randomized Controlled Study. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 88(1), 2910-2916. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.242994
Abdel-Rahman Albahy; Mohamed Elsaid; Ahmed Negm; Abdel-Rahman Mokhtar; AbdelAzim ElGansh; Mohamed Shetewy. "Anatomical Repair Versus Intra Peritoneal Mesh Repair of Umbilical and Paraumbilical Hernia in Ascitic Patients: Randomized Controlled Study". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 88, 1, 2022, 2910-2916. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.242994
Albahy, A., Elsaid, M., Negm, A., Mokhtar, A., ElGansh, A., Shetewy, M. (2022). 'Anatomical Repair Versus Intra Peritoneal Mesh Repair of Umbilical and Paraumbilical Hernia in Ascitic Patients: Randomized Controlled Study', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 88(1), pp. 2910-2916. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.242994
Albahy, A., Elsaid, M., Negm, A., Mokhtar, A., ElGansh, A., Shetewy, M. Anatomical Repair Versus Intra Peritoneal Mesh Repair of Umbilical and Paraumbilical Hernia in Ascitic Patients: Randomized Controlled Study. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2022; 88(1): 2910-2916. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.242994

Anatomical Repair Versus Intra Peritoneal Mesh Repair of Umbilical and Paraumbilical Hernia in Ascitic Patients: Randomized Controlled Study

Article 99, Volume 88, Issue 1, July 2022, Page 2910-2916  XML PDF (506.68 K)
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2022.242994
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Abdel-Rahman Albahy* 1; Mohamed Elsaid1; Ahmed Negm1; Abdel-Rahman Mokhtar2; AbdelAzim ElGansh1; Mohamed Shetewy1
1Departments of 1General Surgery
22Hepatology and Gastroentrology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Umbilical hernia occurs in 20% of the patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with ascites, having a tendency to enlarge rapidly and to complicate. The treatment of umbilical hernia in these patients is a surgical challenge. Ascites control is the mainstay to reduce hernia recurrence and postoperative complications, mesh repair is associated with lower recurrence rate, but with higher surgical site infection when compared to conventional fascial suture. Intraperitoneal mesh repair has advantages of avoiding recurrence, decreasing ascetic leak and wound infection.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of surgical management of umbilical and paraumbilical hernia via anatomical repair and intraperitoneal mesh repair in relation to conservative treatment in ascetic patients.
Patients and methods: This randomized controlled study included 94 patients presented with umbilical and paraumbilical hernia with ascites. The study was conducted in Mansoura University Hospitals through the period from 2016 to 2018. The patients were divided randomly into 3 groups; Conservative treatment group (28 cases), anatomical repair group (36 cases) and intraperitoneal mesh repair via composite mesh group (30 cases). Comparison was done for effectiveness and complications.
Results: Conservative treatment had high rate of complications (60%) and deterioration of hepatic condition (18%), elective surgical correction appeared more safe, intraperitoneal composite mesh repair decreased leak and significantly reduced recurrence and associated complications compared to anatomical repair (17% versus 3%).
Conclusion: Both elective anatomical repair and intraperitoneal mesh repair of umbilical and paraumbilical hernia in ascetic patients were safer and better than conservative treatment. Intraperitoneal mesh repair has advantages of avoiding recurrence and decreasing ascetic leak.
Statistics
Article View: 209
PDF Download: 472
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.