Mohammed, A., Abd El Aziz, M., Abd El Rahim, A. (2018). Conservative Versus Operative Management of Blunt Splenic Injuries. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 73(10), 7659-7665. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.19897
Abduh El-Said Mohammed; Mahmoud Abd El Hady Abd El Aziz; Ahmed Ramadan Abd El Rahim. "Conservative Versus Operative Management of Blunt Splenic Injuries". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 73, 10, 2018, 7659-7665. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.19897
Mohammed, A., Abd El Aziz, M., Abd El Rahim, A. (2018). 'Conservative Versus Operative Management of Blunt Splenic Injuries', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 73(10), pp. 7659-7665. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.19897
Mohammed, A., Abd El Aziz, M., Abd El Rahim, A. Conservative Versus Operative Management of Blunt Splenic Injuries. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2018; 73(10): 7659-7665. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.19897
Conservative Versus Operative Management of Blunt Splenic Injuries
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University
Abstract
Background: The spleen is the most frequently injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma, mainly because of its highly vascularized parenchyma and its anatomic location. In the past the management of blunt splenic injuries was splenectomy, but high rate of operative complications caused paradigm shift from operative to non-operative management (NOM) in hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma patients. Now, nonoperative management of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injuries is the standard of care and has been proven to be safe and successful in the acute setting. The advent of newer imaging techniques with high resolution CT scanners has enabled the clinicians to exactly diagnose the extent of intra-abdominal organ injury. Objective: This work aim to compare between operative and conservative management of splenic trauma. Methodology: Total numbers of patients in this study were 20 patients classified in two groups, the first group contained12 patients and the other group contained 8 patients. The First group was managed conservative and the second was managed operative with splenectomy and splenoraphy. The first group of patients consisted of 9 males (75%) and 3 female (25%). The second group of patients consisted of 6 males (75%) and 2 females (25%). Results: In this study, bunt splenic injury was found to be more common in males because of their risky and hard work. RTA and Falling from a height were found to be the most common causes of blunt abdominal injuries. According to CT, grade one and two of splenic injury are more common than other grades of splenic injury. As regard complication the operative management has more complication as postoperative wound infection and postoperative chest infection. So, NOM of splenic injury is the management of choice in haemodynamically stable patients. Conclusion: The nonoperative management is considered the ideal management for blunt splenic injuries due to less complication, less blood transfusion, less hospital stay and less mortality than operative management.
View on SCiNiTO
Top