• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 100 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Hassan, K., Elhossini, K., Abd Elhady, A. (2021). Comparison between Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion and Single Dose Subcutaneous Long Acting Insulin Injection in Intensive Care Unit. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 84(1), 2625-2632. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.189446
Khaled Mohammed Hassan; Kareem Khaled Elhossini; Abd Elhady Ahmed Helmy Abd Elhady. "Comparison between Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion and Single Dose Subcutaneous Long Acting Insulin Injection in Intensive Care Unit". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 84, 1, 2021, 2625-2632. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.189446
Hassan, K., Elhossini, K., Abd Elhady, A. (2021). 'Comparison between Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion and Single Dose Subcutaneous Long Acting Insulin Injection in Intensive Care Unit', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 84(1), pp. 2625-2632. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.189446
Hassan, K., Elhossini, K., Abd Elhady, A. Comparison between Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion and Single Dose Subcutaneous Long Acting Insulin Injection in Intensive Care Unit. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2021; 84(1): 2625-2632. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.189446

Comparison between Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion and Single Dose Subcutaneous Long Acting Insulin Injection in Intensive Care Unit

Article 159, Volume 84, Issue 1, July 2021, Page 2625-2632  XML PDF (385 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.189446
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Khaled Mohammed Hassan; Kareem Khaled Elhossini email ; Abd Elhady Ahmed Helmy Abd Elhady
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Stress-induced hyperglycemia is a common metabolic disorder in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) cases (30-60%) in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. It is related to increased rates of mortality and morbidity.
Objective: The aim of the current work was to compare between glycemic control in single dose long-acting subcutaneous insulin glargine injection and standard continuous regular insulin infusion in the same critical case.
Patients and methods: This prospective clinical study period was 72 hours for every patient and conducted on 111 patients aged 20-70 years with targeted blood glucose (BG) level ranging from 100 to 200 mg/dl using a different calculated dose of standard insulin infusion according to conventional sliding scale for the 1st 24hr of the study before conversion into insulin glargine single dose injection with 1-hour washout transition period.
Results: APACHE II score was significantly higher in “Uncontrolled hyperglycemia” group in comparison to “Uncontrolled hypoglycemia” group (P=0.030) but insignificantly different between “Controlled” group and “Uncontrolled hyperglycemia” group and between “Controlled” group and “Uncontrolled hypoglycemia” group. Daily units of insulin and mean BG level at 1st day were significantly lower in “Uncontrolled hypoglycemia” group in comparison to “Controlled” group (P=0.002 and 0.002 respectively) and “Uncontrolled hyperglycemia” group (P=0.004 and 0.006 respectively) but insignificantly different between “Controlled” group and “Uncontrolled hyperglycemia” group. While mean BG level was insignificantly different among the three groups at 2nd day, it was insignificantly different between “Controlled” group and “Uncontrolled hyperglycemia” group at 3rd day.
Conclusion: It could be concluded that the use of 100% conversion single dose of long-acting insulin glargine for control of hyperglycemia in critical ICU patients can be considered as an accepted good alternative to the classic use of continuous regular insulin infusion.
 
Keywords
Hyperglycemia; Single-Dose Subcutaneous Long-Acting Insulin; Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion; Intensive Care Unit
Statistics
Article View: 341
PDF Download: 518
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.