• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
El Tagy, P., Abd El Motaal, D., Awaly, D. (2018). Comparison between 3D-Transvaginal Ultrasound and Hysteroscopy in Detecting Uterine Cavity Abnormalities. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 73(7), 7160-7164. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.17606
Prof.Dr. Ahmed Hassan El Tagy; Dr. Ahmed Osama Abd El Motaal; Dr. Mahmoud Awaly. "Comparison between 3D-Transvaginal Ultrasound and Hysteroscopy in Detecting Uterine Cavity Abnormalities". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 73, 7, 2018, 7160-7164. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.17606
El Tagy, P., Abd El Motaal, D., Awaly, D. (2018). 'Comparison between 3D-Transvaginal Ultrasound and Hysteroscopy in Detecting Uterine Cavity Abnormalities', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 73(7), pp. 7160-7164. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.17606
El Tagy, P., Abd El Motaal, D., Awaly, D. Comparison between 3D-Transvaginal Ultrasound and Hysteroscopy in Detecting Uterine Cavity Abnormalities. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2018; 73(7): 7160-7164. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.17606

Comparison between 3D-Transvaginal Ultrasound and Hysteroscopy in Detecting Uterine Cavity Abnormalities

Article 25, Volume 73, Issue 7, October 2018, Page 7160-7164  XML PDF (357.49 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.17606
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Prof.Dr. Ahmed Hassan El Tagy; Dr. Ahmed Osama Abd El Motaal; Dr. Mahmoud Awaly email
Department Of gynecology and obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background: unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities, such as endometrial polyps, small submucous myomas, adhesions, and uterine septum may cause different gynecological complaints such as bleeding and negatively impact chances of success in ART by interfering with implantation or causing spontaneous abortion. Therefore, exclusion of intrauterine pathology is an important step before starting ART and treatment of any discovered lesion may improve ART outcome. The uterine cavity can be evaluated by hysterosalpingography (HSG), transvaginal ultrasound (TVS), sonohysterography (SHG), and hysteroscopy. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for investi-gation of the uterine cavity, particularly when pathology is suspected.
Objective: to assess diagnostic accuracy of three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS) compared with hysteroscopy in detecting uterine cavity abnormalities.
 Study design: this prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted during the January 2018 to June 2018. One hundred women with different uterine pathologies were enrolled. In the mid to late follicular phase of each subject’s menstrual cycle, three D transvaginal ultrasound and hysteroscopy were performed in each patient. Hysteroscopy is widely considered to be the gold standard method for investigation of the uterine cavity. Uterine cavity characteristics and abnormalities were recorded. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were evaluated.
 Results: hysteroscopy was successfully performed in all subjects. Hysteroscopy diagnosed pathological findings in 100 of 100 cases (100%). There were 50 endometrial polyps, 13 submucous myomas, 29 septate uterus, and 8 intrauterine adhesions. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in comparison with hysteroscopy had 85% diagnostic accuracy, 68.2% sensitivity, 91.5% specificity, 79% positive predictive value, and 86% negative predictive value. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.01 and 0.3, respectively. 3D-TVS successfully detected every case of submucous myoma. For detection of endometrial polyps, 3D-TVS had 80.0% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and 90% diagnostic accuracy. For detection of septate uterus, 3D-TVS had 93.10% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and 98% diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion: three D-TVS demonstrated 84.1% diagnostic accuracy for detecting uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile women. A significant percentage of patients had evidence of uterine cavity pathology. Hysteroscopy is, therefore, recommended for accurate detection and diagnosis of uterine cavity lesion.
 
Keywords
Uterine cavity abnormality; three D transvaginal ultrasound; Hysteroscopy; Infertility
Statistics
Article View: 482
PDF Download: 950
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.