Rezk, G., Hashem, H., Helmy, A. (2021). Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam-Fentanyl on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implantation in Sohag University Hospital. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 83(1), 1417-1423. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.168267
Ghada Abd El-gaber Rezk; Hala Mahmoud Hashem; Abd El Hady Ahmed Helmy. "Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam-Fentanyl on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implantation in Sohag University Hospital". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 83, 1, 2021, 1417-1423. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.168267
Rezk, G., Hashem, H., Helmy, A. (2021). 'Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam-Fentanyl on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implantation in Sohag University Hospital', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 83(1), pp. 1417-1423. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.168267
Rezk, G., Hashem, H., Helmy, A. Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam-Fentanyl on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implantation in Sohag University Hospital. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2021; 83(1): 1417-1423. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.168267
Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam-Fentanyl on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implantation in Sohag University Hospital
Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Egypt
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background: Surgery of cochlear implantation is a great advance in otology for patients with deaf mutism, but it carries a great challenge to the anesthesiologist. Objective: The aim of the current work was to compare effect of bolus Dexmedetomidine infusion versus bolus Midazolam- fentanyl infusion as regards; emergence agitation & recovery time, hemodynamics, postoperative pain and complication.
Patient and Methods: This study included a total of 40 pediatric patients (ASA I or II), undergoing cochlear implantation, attending at Sohag University Hospital. They were randomized divided into dexmedetomidine (D) group and midazolam (M) group.
Results: There was no significant difference between both groups as regard intraoperative mean blood pressure. There was a significant difference at discharge time. There was statistically insignificant decrease in heart rate (HR) in group D than M group. There was statistically significant difference at 1 min and discharge measurements. There was a highly significant difference between both groups as the time for recovery being more rapid in D group than in M group. Mask Acceptance Scale (MAS) was better within D group than M group without statistically significant difference. There was a no significant difference in emergence agitation between both groups. There was no significant difference between both groups as regard objective pain score. As regard nausea and vomiting, there was a highly significant difference between both groups.
Conclusion: It could be concluded that dexmedetomidine infusion in cochlear implantation in pediatric patients was equal as midazolam-fentanyl in inducing hypotension, emergence agitation and giving post-operative analgesia. However, dexmedetomidine infusion is better as regardrapid recovery without inducing nausea and vomiting.
View on SCiNiTO
Top