• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 100 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Sultan, S., AbdelBaky, T., ElShazly, M., Youssef, K., Badawy, A. (2020). Comparative Study Between Tubularized Incised Urethral Plate and Tubularized Incised Plate with Preputial Graft in Hypospadias Repair. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 81(7), 2352-2360. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.132877
Sultan Mohamed Sultan; Tarek Mohamed AbdelBaky; Mohamed ElShazly; Khaled Mohamed Magdy Zein Elabden Youssef; Atef Badawy. "Comparative Study Between Tubularized Incised Urethral Plate and Tubularized Incised Plate with Preputial Graft in Hypospadias Repair". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 81, 7, 2020, 2352-2360. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.132877
Sultan, S., AbdelBaky, T., ElShazly, M., Youssef, K., Badawy, A. (2020). 'Comparative Study Between Tubularized Incised Urethral Plate and Tubularized Incised Plate with Preputial Graft in Hypospadias Repair', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 81(7), pp. 2352-2360. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.132877
Sultan, S., AbdelBaky, T., ElShazly, M., Youssef, K., Badawy, A. Comparative Study Between Tubularized Incised Urethral Plate and Tubularized Incised Plate with Preputial Graft in Hypospadias Repair. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2020; 81(7): 2352-2360. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.132877

Comparative Study Between Tubularized Incised Urethral Plate and Tubularized Incised Plate with Preputial Graft in Hypospadias Repair

Article 8, Volume 81, Issue 7, October 2020, Page 2352-2360  XML PDF (578.99 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.132877
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Sultan Mohamed Sultan1; Tarek Mohamed AbdelBaky1; Mohamed ElShazly1; Khaled Mohamed Magdy Zein Elabden Youssef email 2; Atef Badawyorcid 1
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
2Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafr El-Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Hypospadias is a common congenital anomaly, affecting approximately 1 of 300 live male births making hypospadias the second most common birth defect in boys after cryptorchidism. there are more than 100 techniques for urethral reconstruction among these techniques the tubularized incised urethral plate (TIP) which was proposed by Snodgrass in 1994 has been the most popular technique for the repair of primary hypospadias.
Objective: To study the difference between tubularized incised urethral plate and tubularized incised plate with preputial graft in hypospadias repair.
Patient and methods: This prospective randomized study included sixty patients suffering from hypospadias who was admitted to the urology department of Menoufia and Kafr El-Sheikh University Hospitals from December 2018 to June 2020 which were randomized into two groups; group I underwent the classic TIP repair and group II underwent TIP repair with inlay preputial graft. Operative details, postoperative complications were reported also uroflowmetry was done for all cases at the 3rd and 6th months postoperatively.
Results: There was no significant difference between both techniques regarding the postoperative complications and overall success rate (P 0.718) which were 83.3% and 86.7% in A and B respectively. The uroflowmetry at 3rd month postoperatively showed no significant groups difference in Q max between both groups (p >0.05) while there was a significant improvement in Q max in the 6th month in the grafted group (p. 0.001)
Conclusion: despite both the classic TIP repair and TIP with preputial graft were comparable according to the overall success rate and postoperative complications the grafted TIP was more superior to classic TIP in the functional outcomes which were assessed by the uroflowmetry (Q max).
Statistics
Article View: 319
PDF Download: 736
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.