• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 99 (2025)
Volume Volume 98 (2025)
Volume Volume 100 (2025)
Volume Volume 97 (2024)
Volume Volume 96 (2024)
Volume Volume 95 (2024)
Volume Volume 94 (2024)
Volume Volume 93 (2023)
Volume Volume 92 (2023)
Volume Volume 91 (2023)
Volume Volume 90 (2023)
Volume Volume 89 (2022)
Volume Volume 88 (2022)
Volume Volume 87 (2022)
Volume Volume 86 (2022)
Volume Volume 85 (2021)
Volume Volume 84 (2021)
Volume Volume 83 (2021)
Volume Volume 82 (2021)
Volume Volume 81 (2020)
Volume Volume 80 (2020)
Volume Volume 79 (2020)
Volume Volume 78 (2020)
Volume Volume 77 (2019)
Volume Volume 76 (2019)
Volume Volume 75 (2019)
Volume Volume 74 (2019)
Volume Volume 73 (2018)
Volume Volume 72 (2018)
Volume Volume 71 (2018)
Volume Volume 70 (2018)
Volume Volume 69 (2017)
Volume Volume 68 (2017)
Volume Volume 67 (2017)
Volume Volume 66 (2017)
Volume Volume 65 (2016)
Volume Volume 64 (2016)
Volume Volume 63 (2016)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Volume Volume 61 (2015)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
Volume Volume 59 (2015)
Volume Volume 58 (2015)
Volume Volume 57 (2014)
Volume Volume 56 (2014)
Volume Volume 55 (2014)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Volume Volume 53 (2013)
Volume Volume 52 (2013)
Volume Volume 51 (2013)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2012)
Volume Volume 47 (2012)
Volume Volume 46 (2012)
Volume Volume 45 (2011)
Volume Volume 44 (2011)
Volume Volume 43 (2011)
Volume Volume 42 (2011)
Volume Volume 41 (2010)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2010)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2009)
Volume Volume 35 (2009)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2008)
Volume Volume 30 (2008)
Volume Volume 29 (2007)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Volume Volume 27 (2007)
Volume Volume 26 (2007)
Volume Volume 25 (2006)
Volume Volume 24 (2006)
Volume Volume 23 (2006)
Volume Volume 22 (2006)
Volume Volume 21 (2005)
Volume Volume 20 (2005)
Volume Volume 19 (2005)
Volume Volume 18 (2005)
Volume Volume 17 (2004)
Volume Volume 16 (2004)
Volume Volume 15 (2004)
Volume Volume 14 (2004)
Volume Volume 13 (2003)
Volume Volume 12 (2003)
Volume Volume 11 (2003)
Volume Volume 10 (2003)
Volume Volume 9 (2002)
Volume Volume 8 (2002)
Volume Volume 7 (2002)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2001)
Volume Volume 3 (2001)
Volume Volume 2 (2001)
Volume Volume 1 (2000)
Issue Issue 1
Mohamed, N., Mohamed, N., Mansour, M. (2000). Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Cervical Assessment as a Predictor Of Successful Labor Induction. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 1(1), 48-59. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2000.11014
Nahed H. Mohamed; Naglaa H. Mohamed; Mahmoud A. Mansour. "Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Cervical Assessment as a Predictor Of Successful Labor Induction". The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 1, 1, 2000, 48-59. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2000.11014
Mohamed, N., Mohamed, N., Mansour, M. (2000). 'Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Cervical Assessment as a Predictor Of Successful Labor Induction', The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 1(1), pp. 48-59. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2000.11014
Mohamed, N., Mohamed, N., Mansour, M. Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Cervical Assessment as a Predictor Of Successful Labor Induction. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2000; 1(1): 48-59. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2000.11014

Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Cervical Assessment as a Predictor Of Successful Labor Induction

Article 4, Volume 1, Issue 1, December 2000, Page 48-59  XML PDF (571.82 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2000.11014
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Nahed H. Mohamed1; Naglaa H. Mohamed1; Mahmoud A. Mansour2
1Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine for Girls
2Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy Al- Azhar University
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess cervical maturation before labor induction with measurements obtained by transvaginal scans. Cervical length and detection rate of cervical gland area, were compared with Bishop score and serum Prostaglandin E2 levels at term for duration of labor, successful labor induction and mode of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Transvaginal scans were performed for detection of cervical gland area and measurements of cervical length in 80 singleton pregnant women scheduled for induction of labor at >37 weeks of gestation. Cervical ripening was assessed simultaneously by Bishop score and preinduction serum prostaglandin E2 metabolite was detected by ELISA technique. Results were compared against parity, gestational age, and mode of delivery and induction-to-delivery interval. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the studied women were delivered vaginally (46.7% of nulliparous and 84 % of multiparous women). Women with cervical length <3.0 cm and also women with higher PGE2 levels had shorter labors (P< 0.01) and were more likely to be delivered vaginally (P< 0.05). Significant decrease in the detection rate of cervical gland area in women who had shorter labors and were delivery vaginally (P<0.05) and also in multiparous than nulliparous women (P < 0.01) . The mean serum PGE2 level was significantly higher in multiparous than nulliparous women (P < 0.01). Women with Bishop score > 4 also had shorter labors and were more likely to be delivered vaginally (P< 0.05). Whereas, there was no significant difference in the mode of delivery with Bishop score < 4 (P >0.05). Cervical length, detection rate of cervical gland area serum PGE2 levels, and Bishop score showed linear correlation with duration of labor (r =0.47 P< 0.05, r =0.58 P< 0.01, r = 0.67 P< 0.05 and r = 0.43, P <0.01 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ttransvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement is comparable to Bishop score in assessing cervical ripeness for labor induction. Cervical measurement parity and serum PGE2 were independent predictors of the mode of delivery. Whereas, the mode of delivery cold not be predicted in women with Bishop score < 4.
Statistics
Article View: 199
PDF Download: 499
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.