0.05). The mean values of the surface area of alopecia, in tissue expander group (B) was significantly larger than that of hair transplantation in group (A) (P < 0.001). However the time since exposure to the causative injury was significantly longer in group (A) than that of group (B) (P < 0.01). Hair transplantation tends to have less recovery time highly indicated in adults with smaller non-dependent areas of alopecia, while expanders with long recovery period solve bigger problems of alopecia in younger patients. Conclusion: Multiple factors interfere with the surgical plan age, gender, occupation, size and site of alopecia and time since injury. Both hair transplantation and skin expansion are very useful in the field of cicatricial alopecia treatment. While hair transplantation has less hazards during anesthesia, less post-operative scars and less recovery time, skin expansion is a good solution for bigger problems like big area of alopecia or younger patients.]]>
p. 4881−4888
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4889−4893
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4894−4898
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4899−4905
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
211 mm2 , the umbilical cord area measured at 27 – 28 weeks of gestation was able to predict high birth weight (macrosomia), with a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 91.7%. The area under the curve for the ROC was 0.9294, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.8608 to 0.9702, which was found to be statistically highly significant (p = 0.0001). When compared the ROC curves of both the umbilical cord area and the glycated hemoglobin, it was found that umbilical cord area is more reliable in predicting fetal macrosomia at the right criterion, the difference between the predictive efficiency for both parameters was found to be statistically highly significant. Conclusion: Macrosomia is a cause of the worst of obstetric emergencies such as shoulder dystocia, birth asphyxia and postpartum haemorrhage. Shoulder dystocia cannot always be predicted accurately. However, predicting macrosomia can help to identify the population at risk of such complications.]]>
p. 4906−4912
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4913−4919
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4920−4924
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4925−4932
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4933−4937
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4938−4946
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4947−4951
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4952−4955
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4956−4963
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4963−4969
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4970−4975
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4976−4981
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4982−4986
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4987−4992
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 4993−5001
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
0.05). Conclusion: Increase in the macular Ganglion cell (GC) thickness and RNFL at 1 month of follow-up that may be related to laser induced intraretinal inflammation which triggers increased capillary permeability and ensuing axonal edema due to the cytokine release.]]>
p. 5002−5007
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5008−5015
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
0.05). Mustardé procedure (group A) has a significant high percentage of reduction in auriculocephalic distance (P < 0.01), when compared with that of incision-less procedure, the percentage of reduction of the auriculo-temporal distance, and auriculo-mastoid distance of Mustardé procedure (group A) had a non-significant high values when compared with those of incision-less procedure (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Both Mustarde and the incision-less suture techniques provide satisfactory results; however, the incisionless suture technique appears to be easier with less surgical time.]]>
p. 5016−5025
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5026−5031
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5032−5039
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5040−5048
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5049−5055
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5056−5059
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5060−5067
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5068−5073
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2
p. 5074−5080
2090-7125
Vol.77/No.2